diff --git a/docs/classes.rst b/docs/classes.rst index a4463e41..13fa8b53 100644 --- a/docs/classes.rst +++ b/docs/classes.rst @@ -446,8 +446,7 @@ you can use ``py::detail::overload_cast_impl`` with an additional set of parenth Enumerations and internal types =============================== -Let's now suppose that the example class contains an internal enumeration type, -e.g.: +Let's now suppose that the example class contains internal types like enumerations, e.g.: .. code-block:: cpp @@ -457,10 +456,15 @@ e.g.: Cat }; + struct Attributes { + float age = 0; + }; + Pet(const std::string &name, Kind type) : name(name), type(type) { } std::string name; Kind type; + Attributes attr; }; The binding code for this example looks as follows: @@ -471,15 +475,21 @@ The binding code for this example looks as follows: pet.def(py::init()) .def_readwrite("name", &Pet::name) - .def_readwrite("type", &Pet::type); + .def_readwrite("type", &Pet::type) + .def_readwrite("attr", &Pet::attr); py::enum_(pet, "Kind") .value("Dog", Pet::Kind::Dog) .value("Cat", Pet::Kind::Cat) .export_values(); -To ensure that the ``Kind`` type is created within the scope of ``Pet``, the -``pet`` :class:`class_` instance must be supplied to the :class:`enum_`. + py::class_ attributes(pet, "Attributes") + .def(py::init<>()) + .def_readwrite("age", &Pet::Attributes::age); + + +To ensure that the nested types ``Kind`` and ``Attributes`` are created within the scope of ``Pet``, the +``pet`` :class:`class_` instance must be supplied to the :class:`enum_` and :class:`class_` constructor. The :func:`enum_::export_values` function exports the enum entries into the parent scope, which should be skipped for newer C++11-style strongly typed enums.